US Dentistry is at a crossroads.
It is being attacked by powerful activist groups dealing with anti-Fluoride
issue, anti-mercury amalgam issues, and more. People who don't
back down. And, Dentistry has no answers for these people - no counter
for their arguments except to stall, stall, stall. Obfuscate, obfuscate,
obfuscate...
Many US dentistry profit centers
are being challenged. For instance, the whole idea of "root canals"
is under attack - and US dentistry, who, so far, has generated over three
trillion dollars for this horrible dental profit center, is fighting back
ruthlessly, attacking anywhere, and everywhere, as critics of root canals show
themselves. US dentistry's message - "Criticize root canals and we'll
ruin you..."
Can they reach their critics?
Yes, they can, and they do. Even me. Last year, after my first
round of articles about dentistry appeared, and was broadcast to my subscriber
base, my servers were suddenly shut-down by my service provider who had been
threatened by a criminal organization I finally identified as the Spamhaus/SPEWS
criminal conspiracy. Spamhaus, currently under Federal Court Order,
claims to be operated from a single desktop computer on a houseboat in Great
Britain. In actuality, Spamhaus is a vigilante-like organization run by
so-called "volunteers," each of which, I have found, has a financial
interest in Spamhaus's activities. I suspect, with good reason, that a
top Spamhaus "volunteer" simply got a check (or a bag of cash) from a
New York ad agency to falsely label me as a "spammer."
So, what happened recently?
A lot. Last Friday, April
13th, 2007, the Washington DC Federal Appeals Court ruled that it lacked the
jurisdiction in "Mom's Against Mercury, et al v. FDA." But this
was NO VICTORY for FDA. It was the handwriting on the wall. Here's
why, explained by attorney Charlie Brown:
Court declines to rule on
merits in Moms Against
Mercury v. FDA --
but
suggests road map to victory
The
U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that it lacks jurisdiction (the
statutory authority to rule) in
Moms Against Mercury, et
al. v. FDA,
adding the decision is not a ruling on the merits of our
cause and implying a remedy could lie in the U.S. District
Court.
(Full
opinion at
www.cadc.uscourts.gov
-- on right side click ?All Opinions?; see Apr. 13, 2007,
4th case).